“Withholding information is the essence of
tyranny. Control of the flow of information is the tool of the
dictatorship.”
― Bruce Coville
Well we emailed again early this morning, to all
the MFS Committee again. We know they have deliberately and unfairly
moderated us for their own reasons and caused us abysmal service but
this is ridiculous.
We asked "Has anyone rung [the control
person] to see if she is ok? Is anyone even reading their emails?
What's going on?". No acknowledgement and no response.
So, we emailed again just before 11am, pointing
out that it was literally the eleventh hour for the announcement, and
asking the question "Does anyone take their responsibility to
represent members seriously? What is happening?"
A couple of hours later the message finally went
out. Not the item written for MFS Announce but a copy of a similar
item from another list. No apology for the delay, but at least
someone responded. Our responder advised us that she had phoned [the
control person] and the latter's computer was out, but everyone knows
about the weekend so it didn't matter. We think we are the best
ones to make judgements about our publicity and its timing, and
that this could have been an urgent message about a change of venue
or cancellation and we would be sending it to the same black hole.
It is the change from our unmoderated status that
always worked fine with no incident, to a moderated status that seems
to be badly managed with a poor level of service, that is the
problem.
Apparently [the control person] is the only person
that can control our postings. Our responder suggested that we should
have rung [the control person].
I am sure noone would want an angry member phoning
them every time they don't do their self-appointed and insulting job,
and pointing out the offence caused by her actions. That would be
every time and would lead to a heated exchange that wouldn't solve
anything. They would just become more entrenched in their
reprehensible position. "They just don't get it" I'm
afraid.
And how ridiculous if a service that used to work
faultlessly involved us (and only us) telephoning for a
"by-your-leave" each time we send information to members?
Well it is good that one person took the trouble
to find out what the problem was this time, and we appreciate that. I
am sure that if they hadn't, then this would have been just be
another message in the MFS Announce black hole. But what about the
other office bearers and committee members? Do they have any input or
engagement in representing members' interests? What is going on?
No comments:
Post a Comment